Category: Home

Nutrition for body composition

Nutrition for body composition

Nutrition for body composition CS, Liu IT, Liang Nutritiln, et al. By Grant Tinsley, Ph. Manore M. However, unlike Burke et al. Diets fitting this profile have a limited amount of research. Hoffmann, I.

Nutrition for body composition -

Third, environmental conditions, namely outdoor temperature, affect physical activity in knee OA but were not considered in this analysis. Fourth, CLSA documentation identifies that, at the developmental stage of the CLSA, it was deemed inappropriate to combine dissimilar ethnic groups, while also logistically challenging to obtain a sufficient sample in distinct groups.

Lifestyle behaviours, characterised by NUR and physical activity, appear more important than dietary intake eg, fibre or NUT HC for body composition in older Canadians with OA. This study suggests that body composition may provide more insight than crude measures of body size in understanding OA pathology; and that OA interventions should target both physical activity and the behaviours surrounding nutrition.

Future interventions should explore a combination of physical activity and mitigation of NUR through removal of barriers to improved food intake and education on diet quality to improve body composition and outcomes of those living with OA.

Ethical approval was received from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The authors would like to acknowledge Professor Paul Stratford from the School of Rehabilitation Science at McMaster University for statistical support.

Contributors All authors contributed to the design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and final approval of the article. MRM is the guarantor. Funding JNC-H was supported through a Canadian Institutes of Health Research CIHR fellowship award.

MRM is supported by The Arthritis Society Stars Career Development Award, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis. Operating costs were supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC Discovery grant MRM.

Funding for the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging CLSA is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research CIHR under grant reference: LSA and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this manuscript are the author's own and do not reflect the views of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Competing interests No, there are no competing interests. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed by Emmanuel Baah, University of North Carolina System, USA.

Skip to main content. Log In More Log in via Institution. Log in via OpenAthens. Log in using your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts. Forgot your log in details?

Register a new account? Forgot your user name or password? Search for this keyword. Advanced search. Latest content Archive Authors About BMJ NPH Collections.

Close More Main menu Latest content Archive Authors About BMJ NPH Collections. Log in via Institution. You are here Home Online First Nutrition risk, physical activity and fibre intake are associated with body composition in OA: analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Email alerts. Article Text. Article menu. Article Text Article info Citation Tools Share Rapid Responses Article metrics Alerts. other Versions You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article July 04, View the most recent version of this article.

Original research. Nutrition risk, physical activity and fibre intake are associated with body composition in OA: analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Abstract Objective Sarcopenic obesity is a key feature in osteoarthritis OA. Data availability statement Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.

Statistics from Altmetric. musculo-skeletal health nutrition assessment physical performance WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC The loss of lean tissue and accumulation of fatty tissue are linked with worse structural disease and illness experience outcomes in osteoarthritis OA.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Determinants of body composition point to important therapeutic targets for this disease. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY Our findings show that higher engagement in physical activity, lower nutrition risk and, to a small extent higher fibre cereal intake, were associated with better body composition in a sample of Canadian older adults with OA.

Methods Sample This research was conducted using baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging CLSA comprehensive data set. Food intake and nutrition risk Food intake variables were measured using the Short Diet Questionnaire.

Physical activity Physical activity was measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly PASE. Covariates Covariates included age, sex, BMI, OA type, depressive symptoms and socioeconomic factors. Dependent variables: body composition Body composition was measured using an Hologic Discovery A dual energy X-ray absorptiometry DEXA scanner.

Data analysis Regression analyses were performed for each body composition outcome as a dependent variable lean mass, fat mass, body fat percentage, total mass. View this table: View inline View popup. Table 1 Characteristics of participants whose data were included in these analyses mean SD , minimum, maximum.

Covariate model Each of the covariate models explained a large amount of variance for each of the body composition outcomes. Table 2 Regression models for lean mass. Table 3 Regression models for fat mass.

Table 4 Regression models for body fat percentage. Table 5 Regression models for total mass. Figure 2 Linear regression margin plots for significant predictor variables high fibre cereal, nutrition risk score, physical activity : lean mass top row , fat mass middle row , fat percentage bottom row.

Discussion Lower self-reported physical activity and greater NUR, reflecting nutrition behaviours that are associated with malnutrition, were associated with less lean mass and greater fat mass and body fat percentage in Canadian older adults with OA.

Importance of NUR for body composition in OA NUR was associated with body composition in this large sample of Canadian older adults with OA. Physical activity and body composition in OA In this OA subsample from the CLSA data set, physical activity level was associated with body composition.

Body composition versus total body mass in OA While physical activity, NUR and fibre intake were associated with elements of body composition, these independent variables were not associated with total mass.

Limitations First, the Short Diet Questionnaire to assess food intake was brief, and the individual items of a NUT HC and NUT FBR were used to categorise the quality of diet. Conclusions Lifestyle behaviours, characterised by NUR and physical activity, appear more important than dietary intake eg, fibre or NUT HC for body composition in older Canadians with OA.

Ethics statements Patient consent for publication Not applicable. Ethics approval Ethical approval was received from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge Professor Paul Stratford from the School of Rehabilitation Science at McMaster University for statistical support. In: Badley E, Glazier R, EDS.

arthritis and related conditions in Ontario. Toronto , Canada PHA of, Information CI for H. Obesity in Canada ; Sharif B , Kopec J , Bansback N , et al. Projecting the direct cost burden of osteoarthritis in Canada using a microsimulation model.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 23 : — OpenUrl PubMed. Felson DT , Lawrence RC , Dieppe PA , et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med ; : — 9. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science. Sowers MR , Karvonen-Gutierrez CA.

The evolving role of obesity in knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol ; 22 : — 7. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed. Reyes C , Leyland KM , Peat G , et al. Association between overweight and obesity and risk of clinically diagnosed knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study.

Arthritis Rheumatol ; 68 : — Lee S , Kim T-N , Kim S-H. Sarcopenic obesity is more closely associated with knee osteoarthritis than is nonsarcopenic obesity: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum ; 64 : — Kim SR , Choi K-H , Jung G-U , et al.

Associations between fat mass, lean mass, and knee osteoarthritis: the fifth Korean National health and nutrition examination survey KNHANES V. Calcif Tissue Int ; 99 : — Nur H , Tuncer T. The relationship between body composition and knee osteoarthritis in postmenopausal women.

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil ; 64 : — 5. Ding C , Stannus O , Cicuttini F , et al. Body fat is associated with increased and lean mass with decreased knee cartilage loss in older adults: a prospective cohort study. Int J Obes ; 37 : — 7. Berry PA , Wluka AE , Davies-Tuck ML , et al.

The relationship between body composition and structural changes at the knee. Rheumatology ; 49 : — 9. Logan SL , Gottlieb BH , Maitland SB , et al. The physical activity scale for the elderly PASE questionnaire; does it predict physical health? Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 10 : — Christensen P , Frederiksen R , Bliddal H , et al.

Comparison of three weight maintenance programs on cardiovascular risk, bone and vitamins in sedentary older adults. Obesity ; 21 : — Messier SP , Mihalko SL , Legault C , et al.

Effects of intensive diet and exercise on knee joint loads, inflammation, and clinical outcomes among overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: the idea randomized clinical trial. JAMA ; : — Bennell KL , Wrigley TV , Hunt MA , et al.

Update on the role of muscle in the genesis and management of knee osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 39 : — Jeanmaire C , Mazières B , Verrouil E , et al. Body composition and clinical symptoms in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: results from the KHOALA cohort.

Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 47 : — Dent E , Hoogendijk EO , Visvanathan R , et al. Malnutrition screening and assessment in hospitalised older people: a review. J Nutr Health Aging ; 23 : — Rist G , Miles G , Karimi L. The presence of malnutrition in community-living older adults receiving home nursing services.

Nutrition and Dietetics ; 69 : 46 — Bales CW , Porter Starr KN , Starr KNP. Obesity interventions for older adults: diet as a determinant of physical function.

Adv Nutr ; 9 : — 9. Chatindiara I , Williams V , Sycamore E , et al. Associations between nutrition risk status, body composition and physical performance among community-dwelling older adults. Aust N Z J Public Health ; 43 : 56 — Chopp-Hurley JN , Wiebenga EG , Keller HH , et al.

Diet and nutrition risk affect mobility and general health in osteoarthritis: data from the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 75 : — Raina P , Wolfson C , Kirkland S.

Canadian longitudinal study on aging CLSA protocol version 3. Raina PS , Wolfson C , Kirkland SA , et al. The Canadian longitudinal study on aging CLSA.

Aging ; 28 : — 9. Ashe MC , Miller WC , Eng JJ , et al. Older adults, chronic disease and leisure-time physical activity.

Gerontology ; 55 : 64 — Grotto D , Zied E. The standard American diet and its relationship to the health status of Americans. Nutr Clin Pract ; 25 : — Dietary fiber intake in relation to knee pain trajectory. Arthritis Care Res ; 69 : — 9. Behavioral and lifestyle modification strategies are still poorly researched areas of weight management.

There are several major diet types interspersed with a multitude of subtypes. This creates a maze of conflicting principles that may be difficult for the general public and practitioners to navigate. Compounding the confusion is the continued propagation of fad diets across a range of media outlets, replete with unfounded practices.

Therefore, it is important to examine the scientific evidence in a systematic way in order to devise recommendations to guide healthcare practitioners, coaches including trainers, dietitians, and sports nutritionists , athletes, and the general public regarding all of the above.

The purpose of this position stand is to provide clarity on the effects of various diets on body composition. Thus, the following dietary archetypes will be assessed: very-low- and low-energy diets VLED and LED , low-fat diets LFD , low-carbohydrate diets LCD , ketogenic diets KD , high-protein diets HPD , and intermittent fasting IF.

Diets with qualitative themes or commercial brands will inevitably fall under the umbrella of the classifications above. will receive the majority of scrutiny in this position stand. This position stand will further focus on prospective intervention trials with a duration of at least 4 weeks, as this can be considered a minimum period of time for meaningful changes in fat mass FM and lean mass LM, termed interchangeably with fat-free mass, or FFM , as well as effects of exercise training on these variables.

Studies and pooled analyses with and without training have been included, as well as studies across the range of energetic balances i. Studies that did not measure body composition have not been included, nor have studies examining dietary effects in clinical contexts — including disease treatment.

Despite the latter topics breaching the scope of the present article, it is still important to note that body composition is inextricably tied to foundational parameters of health.

Aside from sports and fitness applications for improvements in body composition, a higher proportion of LM reduces the risk of developing metabolic syndrome [ 1 ], bone loss [ 2 ], and the multiple complications associated with sarcopenia [ 3 , 4 ].

Body composition assessment is an attempt to simplify a process that is inherently complex. As such, there are several methods that attempt to accurately estimate LM and FM, and their subcomponents.

Before outlining the most common methods used in sports science and medicine, it should be noted that there is a continuum of the components measured or estimated. Over 25 years ago, Wang et al. Each level has different components, eventually deemed compartments, and have undergone further organization to include two 2C , three 3C and four 4C compartments [ 6 ]:.

Atomic level: hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sulfur. Molecular level: The 4C model includes FM, total body water TBW , total body protein, and bone mineral content.

The 3C model includes FM, TBW, and nonfat solids. An alternate 3C model includes FM, bone mineral, and residual mass. The 2C model includes FM and FFM. Cellular level: The 3C model includes cells, extracellular fluids, and extracellular solids. The 4C model includes body cell mass, FM, extracellular fluids, and extracellular solids.

Tissue-organ level: adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, bone, visceral organs, other tissues. The 4C model has the greatest degree of sensitivity to interindividual variability of FFM composition. The 2C model estimates FM and FFM, and operates under the assumption that water, protein, and mineral content of FFM are constant.

Thus, the 2C model is the most commonly used approach for adults. Examples of methods based on the 2C model include hydrodensitometry underwater weighing , air displacement plethysmography ADP or BOD POD ® , skinfold thickness, and bioelectrical impedance analysis BIA. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry DXA is based on a 3C model that measures bone mineral content, LM, and FM, but it is still subject to confounding from inter-assessment differences in hydration, glycogen, and muscle creatine levels, which can be significant in athletic populations with distinct exercise and recovery cycles [ 7 , 8 ].

Body composition methods have been further classified as direct, indirect, and criterion [ 9 ]. Examples include TBW, isotope dilution, and neutron activation. Indirect methods provide surrogate measures or proxies of direct methods and criterion methods.

Examples of indirect methods are anthropometry e. Criterion methods measure a specific property of the body such as density or distribution of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Examples include hydrodensitometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging MRI , and DXA.

It should be noted that multi-compartment models have evolved to be considered criterion methods: standards against which other methods are judged. The various methods are often classified in the literature as either laboratory methods e.

Laboratory methods — including multi-compartment models — have traditionally been viewed as more accurate and valid. BIA and BIS have evolved to include multiple frequencies. This technology may more accurately estimate body composition through multiple frequency-dependent electrical properties of body tissues, as opposed to traditional single frequency methods i.

However, higher levels of sophistication with multi-frequency options are often accompanied by lower availability and higher cost. Note that LED have also been given a more liberal definition of providing — kcal [ 22 ]. Very-low-energy diets are typically in liquid form and commercially prepared.

The aim of the diet is to induce rapid weight loss 1. VLED are designed to replace all regular food consumption, and therefore should not be confused with meal replacement products intended to replace one or two meals per day.

As such, VLED are fortified with the full spectrum of essential micronutrients. A protein-sparing modified fast can be considered the higher-protein variant of a VLED, with protein intakes of approximately 1.

A week trial by Bryner et al. There was actually a slight gain, but it did not reach statistical significance. Resting metabolic rate RMR significantly increased in the training group, but it decreased in the control group. Donnelly et al. While these results cannot necessarily be extrapolated to lean, trained subjects, they are nevertheless intriguing.

In obese populations, aggressive caloric restriction is a potentially powerful intervention since a greater initial weight loss is associated with greater long-term success in weight loss maintenance [ 27 ].

However, a meta-analysis by Tsai and Wadden [ 22 ] found that VLED did not result in greater long-term 1 year or more weight loss than LED. Eight to 12 week VLED are common in clinical practice before transitioning to less severe caloric restriction; however, there is an ongoing debate regarding the duration that can be safely sustained for VLED.

Multiple deaths have been reported due to low-quality protein intake, excessive loss of lean mass, and inadequate medical supervision [ 28 ]. Adverse effects of VLED include cold intolerance, fatigue, headache, dizziness, muscle cramps, and constipation.

Hair loss was reported to be the most common complaint of extended VLED use [ 22 ]. It should be noted that VLED use has limited relevance to healthy and athletic populations. This is based on the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges AMDR for adults, set by the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine [ 30 ].

Although the classification of LFD is based on the AMDR, it might be more accurate to call them high-carbohydrate diets, given the dominance of this macronutrient in the ranges. As such, the definition of LFD is inherently subjective. Scientists and physicians have promoted decreased fat intake since the s [ 31 ].

The publication of the Dietary Goals for the United States , and the publication of the inaugural Dietary Guidelines for Americans DGA reinforced a reduction in total fat intake with the aim of improving public health [ 32 ].

Although the AMDR were published in , their staying power is apparent since the recently updated DGA adheres to these ranges [ 33 ], as do major health organizations such as the American Heart Association, American Diabetes Association and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. A recent systematic review by Hooper et al.

Reducing the proportion of dietary fat compared to usual intake modestly but consistently reduced body weight, body fat, and waist circumference. Excluded from the analysis were RCTs where subjects in either the control or experimental groups had the intention to reduce weight.

The implication of these findings is that reducing the proportion of dietary fat can cause a de facto reduction of total energy intake, thereby reducing body fat over time.

The premise of dietary fat reduction for weight loss is to target the most energy-dense macronutrient to impose hypocaloric conditions. However, over the long-term, diets with lower energy density have not consistently yielded greater weight loss than energy restriction alone [ 37 , 38 ]. Reasons for the disparity between short- and long-term effects of energy density reduction include speculation that learned compensation is occurring.

In addition, postprandial factors may increase sensory-specific satiety that over time can reduce the initial palatability of energy-dense foods [ 39 ].

Diets fitting this profile have a limited amount of research. The body of controlled intervention data on VLFD mainly consists of trials examining the health effects of vegetarian and vegan diets that aggressively minimize fat intake.

These diets have shown consistently positive effects on weight loss [ 40 ], but this literature lacks body composition data. Among the few studies that did, the A TO Z Weight Loss Study by Gardner et al. Similar results were seen by de Souza et al.

No significant between-group differences were seen in the loss of total abdominal, subcutaneous, or visceral fat at either six months or two years.

A mean loss of 2. No LM-retentive advantage was seen in the higher-protein diets, but this could have been due to both protein intake levels being sub-optimal 1. Similar to LFD, low-carbohydrate diets LCD are a broad category lacking an objective definition.

There is no universal agreement on what quantitatively characterizes an LCD. However, other published definitions of LCD disregard the limits set in the AMDR. In absolute rather than proportional terms, LCD have been defined as having less than g of carbohydrate [ 43 ].

Some investigators have taken issue with this liberal definition of LCD, preferring to delineate non-ketogenic LCD as containing 50— g, and KD as having a maximum of 50 g [ 45 ]. Meta-analyses comparing the effects of LFD with LCD have yielded mixed results across a wide range of parameters.

Liberal operational definitions of LCD e. Recently, Hashimoto et al. Eight RCTs included a very LCD treatment, and 7 RCTs included a mild LCD treatment. With all groups considered, FM decrease was significantly greater in the LCD than the control diets.

However, sub-analysis showed that fat mass decrease in very LCD was greater than the controls, while the difference in FM decrease between mild LCD and controls was not significant. A separate sub-analysis of short- versus long-term effects found that both types of LCD yielded significantly greater fat loss than controls in trials less than, as well as longer than 12 months.

A further sub-analysis of found that BIA failed to detect significant between-group differences in FM reduction, while DXA showed significantly greater decreases in LCD than controls. Practical relevance is questionable given the obese nature of the subjects.

The authors speculated that the advantage of the LCD over the control diets could have been due to their higher protein content. Despite being a subtype of LCD, the ketogenic diet KD deserves a separate discussion.

Whereas non-ketogenic LCD is subjectively defined, KD is objectively defined by its ability to elevate circulating ketone bodies measurably — a state called ketosis, also known as physiological or nutritional ketosis.

Ketosis is a relatively benign state not to be confused with ketoacidosis, which is a pathological state seen in type 1 diabetics, where a dangerous overproduction of ketones occurs in the absence of exogenous insulin.

The primary ketone produced hepatically is acetoacetate, and the primary circulating ketone is β-hydroxybutyrate [ 50 ].

Depending on the degree of restriction of carbohydrate or total energy, KD can raise circulating ketone levels to a range of ~0. The proposed fat loss advantage of carbohydrate reduction beyond a mere reduction in total energy is based largely on insulin-mediated inhibition of lipolysis and presumably enhanced fat oxidation.

However, a single-arm study by Hall et al. Blood ketone levels plateaued at ~1. This was accompanied by a transient increase in nitrogen loss, potentially suggesting a stress response including the ramping up of gluconeogenesis.

It has been postulated that the production and utilization of ketone bodies impart a unique metabolic state that, in theory, should outperform non-ketogenic conditions for the goal of fat loss [ 45 ]. Even small differences in protein can result in significant advantages to the higher intake.

A meta-analysis by Clifton et al. Soenen et al. This is not too surprising, considering that protein is known to be the most satiating macronutrient [ 54 ]. This led to a body weight decrease of 4. With scant exception [ 56 ], all controlled interventions to date that matched protein and energy intake between KD and non-KD conditions have failed to show a fat loss advantage of the KD [ 51 , 53 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].

Perhaps the strongest evidence against the alleged metabolic advantage of carbohydrate restriction is a recent pair of meta-analyses by Hall and Guo [ 60 ], which included only isocaloric, protein-matched controlled feeding studies where all food intake was provided to the subjects as opposed to self-selected and self-reported intake.

A total of 32 studies were included in the analysis. No thermic or fat loss advantage was seen in the lower-CHO conditions. In fact, the opposite was revealed. The problem with this claim is that the rise in fat oxidation — objectively measured via decreased respiratory quotient — reaches a plateau within the first week of a KD [ 51 ].

Increased oxidation of free fatty acids, plasma triacylglycerol, and intramuscular triacylglycerol during exercise is a well-established response to fat-rich diets [ 63 ]. However, this rise in fat oxidation is often misconstrued as a greater rate of net FM reduction.

This assumption ignores the concomitant increase in fat intake and storage. As a result of fat-adaptation, increased intramuscular triacylglycerol levels indicate increased fat synthesis over degradation during the rest periods between exercise bouts [ 64 ].

To reiterate a previous point, rigorously controlled isocaloric, protein-matched studies have consistently demonstrated that ketoadaptation does not necessarily amount to a net decrease in fat balance, which is ultimately what matters. If there is any advantage to KD over non-KD for fat loss, it is potentially in the realm of appetite regulation.

This occurs via spontaneous energy intake reduction, which could be due to increased satiety through a suppression of ghrelin production [ 70 ].

Moreover, KD has demonstrated hunger-suppressive effects independent of protein content. In a 4-week crossover design, Johnstone et al. In further support of this idea, a meta-analysis by Gibson et al. However, it remains unclear whether the appetite suppression is due to ketosis or other factors such as an increased protein or fat intake, or restriction of carbohydrate.

An area of growing interest is the effect of KD on athletic performance. Since training capacity has the potential to affect body composition, the effect of KD on exercise performance warrants discussion. However, in contrast to the proposed benefits of fat-adaptation on performance, Havemann et al.

Stellingwerff et al. The high-fat diet increased fat oxidation, but also lowered pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and decreased glycogenolysis. These results provide a mechanistic explanation for the impairment in high-intensity work output as a result of high-fat, CHO-restricted diets [ 62 , 65 , 67 ].

Recently, an ergolytic effect from ketoadaptation has been observed at lower intensities as well. Burke et al. However, this was accompanied by a reduction in exercise economy increased oxygen demand for a given speed.

The linear and non-linear high-CHO diets in the comparison both caused significant performance improvements, while no significant improvement was seen in the KD there was a nonsignificant performance decrease.

It is notable that Paoli et al. Furthermore, the KD resulted in significant loss of FM 1. However, unlike Burke et al. Wilson et al. A common thread among high-protein diets HPD is that they have their various and subjective definitions. High-protein diets have also been identified as ranging from 1.

Classic work by Lemon et al. showed that protein consumed at double the RDA 1. However, Pasiakos et al. More recently, Longland et al.

A unique methodological strength in Longland et al. Subjects were also provided all food and beverage intake, which added an extra layer of control and strengthened the findings. Augmenting this body of literature is Arciero et al. Of the macronutrients, protein has the highest thermic effect and is the most metabolically expensive.

Given this, it is not surprising that higher protein intakes have been seen to preserve resting energy expenditure while dieting [ 54 ]. Also, protein is the most satiating macronutrient, followed by carbohydrate, and fat being the least [ 83 ].

With just one exception [ 84 ], a succession of recent meta-analyses [ 52 , 85 , 86 , 87 ] supports the benefit of higher protein intakes for reducing body weight, FM, and waist circumference, and preserving LM in an energy deficit.

A systematic review by Helms et al. This is one of the rare pieces of literature that report protein requirements on the basis of FFM rather than total body weight. Antonio et al. First in the series, the addition of dietary protein amounting to 4. A subsequent 8-week investigation involved resistance-trained subjects on a formally administered, periodized resistance training protocol [ 90 ].

The high-protein group HP consumed 3. HP and NP showed significant gains in LM 1. A significantly greater fat mass decrease occurred in HP compared to NP 1. A subsequent 8-week crossover trial [ 91 ] in resistance-trained subjects compared protein intakes of 3.

A lack of significant differences in body composition and strength performance were seen despite a significantly higher caloric intake in HP vs. NP an increase of vs. In agreement with previous findings, there were no differences in body composition importantly, no significant increase in fat mass , despite a significantly higher caloric intake in HP vs.

This study also addressed health concerns about long-term high protein intakes 3—4 times the RDA by demonstrating no adverse effects on a comprehensive list of measured clinical markers, including a complete metabolic panel and blood lipid profile.

An in-patient, metabolic ward study by Bray et al. All three groups gained total body weight, but LP lost 0. Moreover, the NP and HP groups gained 2.

All three groups gained body fat 3. These results are seemingly at odds with Antonio et al. However, aside from the tighter control and surveillance inherent with metabolic ward conditions, Bray et al. Speculation over the fate of the extra protein consumed in the Antonio et al.

studies [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ] may include a higher thermic effect of feeding, increased non-exercise activity thermogenesis NEAT , increased thermic effect of exercise TEE , increased fecal energy excretion, reduced intake of the other macronutrients via increased satiety and suppressed hepatic lipogenesis.

It should be noted as well that there might have been a misreporting of energy intake. Intermittent fasting IF can be divided into three subclasses: alternate-day fasting ADF , whole-day fasting WDF , and time-restricted feeding TRF [ 93 ].

The most extensively studied IF variant is ADF, which typically involves a hour fasting period alternated with a hour feeding period. Lean mass retention has been a surprisingly positive effect of ADF [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ].

However, lean mass loss in ADF conditions has also been observed by other investigators [ 98 , 99 , ]. The latter effect might be attributable to more severe energy deficits. Recently, Catenacci et al. Whole-day fasting involves one to two hour fasting periods throughout the week of otherwise maintenance intake to achieve an energy deficit.

Although WDF has been consistently effective for weight loss, Harvie et al. A subsequent study by Harvie et al. Both WDF diets caused greater 3-month fat loss than DER 3.

Time-restricted feeding typically involves a fasting period of 16—20 hours and a feeding period of 4—8 hours daily.

The most widely studied form of TRF is Ramadan fasting, which involves approximately 1 month of complete fasting both food and fluid from sunrise to sunset. Unsurprisingly, significant weight loss occurs, and this includes a reduction in lean mass as well as fat mass [ , ]. Aside from Ramadan fasting studies, dedicated TRF research has been scarce until recently.

An 8-week trial by Tinsley et al. No limitations were placed on the amounts and types of food consumed in the 4-hour eating window. A standardized resistance training program was administered 3 days per week. The TRF group lost body weight, due to a significantly lower energy intake kcal less on fasting compared to non-fasting days.

Cross sectional area of the biceps brachii and rectus femoris increased similarly in both the TRF and normal diet ND group.

No significant changes in body composition via DXA were seen between groups. Despite a lack of statistical significance, there were notable effect size differences in lean soft tissue ND gained 2.

Although both groups increased strength without significant between-group differences, effect sizes were greater in the TRF group for bench press endurance, hip sled endurance, and maximal hip sled strength. This finding should be viewed cautiously given the potential for greater and more variable neurological gains in untrained subjects.

A subsequent study by Moro et al. normal diet control group ND 1. Macronutrient intake between the TRF and ND groups was matched, unlike the aforementioned Tinsley et al. study [ ] whereby protein intake was disparate and sub-optimal 1. The mechanisms underlying these results are not clear.

The authors speculated that increased adiponectin levels in the TRF group could have stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis via interacting with PPAR-gamma, in addition to adiponectin acting centrally to increase energy expenditure.

However, the TRF group also experienced unfavorable changes such as decreased testosterone and triiodothyronine levels. Seimon et al. Their review included 40 studies in total, 12 of which directly compared an IER with a CER condition.

Interestingly, IER was found to be superior at suppressing hunger. The authors speculated that this might be attributable to ketone production in the fasting phases.

However, this effect was immaterial since on the whole, IF failed to result in superior improvements in body composition or greater weight loss compared to CER. Table 2 outlines the characteristics of the major diet archetypes. In its simplest form, CICO is an acronym for the idea that weight loss or gain is determined by a caloric deficit or surplus, regardless of diet composition.

While this technically is true, it fails to account for the composition of the weight gained or lost, as well as the multitude of factors that drive eating behaviors that dictate caloric intake. Variability in the thermic effect of fat can be attributed to differences in molecular structure that significantly alter its metabolism.

For example, Seaton et al. Differences in the TEF of protein have also been observed in direct comparisons. Acheson et al. All protein sources had a higher thermic effect than an all-CHO meal.

Importantly, the thermic effect of each macronutrient can vary within and across individuals [ ]. In any case, protein has consistently shown a higher thermic effect than carbohydrate or fat. The thermic effect of food TEF , also called diet-induced thermogenesis, is one of several components of EE.

The largest component of TDEE, at least among individuals not involved in extremely high volumes of exercise, is resting energy expenditure REE , which is often mentioned interchangeably with resting metabolic rate RMR or basal metabolic rate BMR. Basal metabolic rate is the energetic cost of the biological processes required for survival at rest.

As a matter of technical trivia, BMR is measured in an overnight fasted state, lying supine at complete rest, in the postabsorptive state the condition in which the gastrointestinal tract is empty of nutrients and body stores must supply required energy.

The other main component of TDEE is non-resting energy expenditure, which is comprised of 3 subcomponents: non-exercise activity thermogenesis NEAT , exercise activity thermogenesis EAT , and finally, TEF.

While BMR and TEF are relatively static, NEAT and EAT vary widely within and across individuals. The impact of NEAT can be substantial since it can vary by as much as kcals between individuals of similar size [ ].

Table 3 outlines the components of TDEE, with examples of low, moderate, and high TDEE [ , , ]. While this advice technically is the answer, the challenge lies in programming the variables so that the desired energy balance is sustained over the long-term, and the targeted body composition is reached and maintained while preventing or minimizing REE losses.

Involuntary adaptive shifts separate humans from machines. We differ from bomb calorimeters primarily due to our dynamic nature, which is based on the homeostatic drive toward survival. When hypocaloric conditions are imposed, energy expenditure has a tendency to decrease.

Conversely, when a caloric surplus is imposed, EE has a tendency to increase. However, human energy balance has been called an asymmetric control system [ ], because it tends to be lopsided in favor of more easily gaining weight but less easily losing weight.

The degree of processing or refinement of foods can influence their thermic effect. The authors speculated that the greater mechanized preparation of the processed food caused less peristalsis and a greater loss of bioactive compounds, resulting in fewer metabolites, thus requiring less enzyme activity.

This would lead to more energetically efficient absorption and metabolism. It is important to note that this was not a comparison of a highly processed food versus a whole food. Both of the meals in the comparison were cheese sandwiches. One just happened to have less mechanical refinement, and slightly more fiber and protein.

The results of this study imply that processed foods are more fattening or less effective for weight management. However, the contrary has been demonstrated.

Meal replacement products powders, shakes, and bars have matched or outperformed the effectiveness of whole food-based diets for weight loss and weight loss maintenance [ 82 , , ]. An awareness of tissue-specific metabolism can be helpful in understanding the resting metabolic benefits of improving body composition.

It can also serve to clarify the widely misunderstood and often overestimated contribution of muscle to REE. In contrast, muscle and adipose tissue expend 13 and 4.

This should debunk the notion that increases in muscle mass give individuals the license to reduce dietary discretion. However, on a net basis accounting for the total mass of each tissue in the body , muscle, brain, and liver are the top-3 contributors to overall REE.

Thus, substantial losses in LM — including muscle — can meaningfully impact REE. Finally, it should be noted that tissue-specific EE can vary according to obese vs. non-obese status, advanced age, and to a lesser degree, sex [ ]. Table 4 outlines the contribution of organs and tissues to REE in healthy adult humans [ ].

Humans have a remarkable ability to maintain a relatively constant body weight through adult life despite wide variations in daily energy intake and expenditure.

This indicates a highly sophisticated integration of systems that tirelessly auto-regulate homeostasis. In the case of hypocaloric conditions, the body up-regulates hunger and down-regulates energy expenditure. This regulatory system is influenced by nutritional, behavioral, autonomic, and endocrine factors [ ].

The changes in EE are not always completely accounted for by changes in lean mass and fat mass. Therefore, in the context of hypocaloric diets, adaptive thermogenesis AT is a term used to describe the gray area where losses in metabolic tissue cannot simply explain reduced EE.

The mechanisms underlying AT are unclear, but speculations include increased sympathetic drive and decreased thyroid activity. A classic experiment by Leibel et al. Imposed reductions in EE via low-protein VLED do not necessarily reflect what is possible under conditions involving better macronutrient targets and proper training.

In contrast to Leibel et al. The discrepancy between Bryner et al. can be explained by better macronutrient distribution and the implementation of resistance exercise.

Bryner et al. More recently, Camps et al. While this can be viewed as the unfortunate persistence of weight loss-induced AT, the actual difference in RMR at baseline versus 52 weeks was a reduction of 81 kcal, where total weight loss was 5. However, it is worth reiterating that higher protein alongside resistance training has been shown to prevent this impairment despite severe caloric restriction [ 25 ].

As it stands, the subjects were not engaged in structured exercise at any point let alone a resistance training program that would support the metabolic activity of lean mass , and the details of their maintenance diet were not reported.

In all likelihood, it was not optimized in terms of macronutrition. Misreporting energy intake and output is a common occurrence that has the potential to be mistaken for metabolic adaptation. For example, Lichtman et al. In the experimental group, no subject had a TEE more than 9.

Clearly, the gap between perceived compliance and actual compliance remains a major challenge to the goal of improving body composition. In hypocaloric conditions, adaptive thermogenesis AT is a misnomer; it would more accurately be called adaptive thermoreduction due to a reduction in energy expenditure in response to reductions in energy intake.

Joosen and Westerterp [ ] examined the literature 11 studies to see if AT existed in overfeeding experiments. No evidence beyond the theoretical costs of increased body size and TEF were found.

Nevertheless, there is substantial interindividual variability in the energetic response to overfeeding. Others show less homeostatic drive and greater efficiency of energy storage. This interindividual variability is due, at least in part, to differences in NEAT. It is possible that conscious and unconscious increases in NEAT can pose a significant challenge to weight gain.

A prime illustration of this is a study by Levine et al. On average, kcal were stored, and kcal were burned. This finding explains why some individuals can purposely increase daily caloric intake and still experience a lack of weight gain.

Unbeknownst to them, increased NEAT can negate the targeted caloric surplus. The partitioning of a chronic energy surplus into the various tissue compartments is an important yet understudied area.

Rosqvistet al. Despite similar gains in total body weight 1. Furthermore, liver fat and visceral fat deposition were significantly greater in SFA. The authors speculated that a greater oxidation of PUFA might have decreased the production of non-esterified fatty acids, which in turn could have lowered hepatic triacylglycerol synthesis.

Caution is warranted when attempting to generalize these results beyond the fat sources used palm oil for SFA, sunflower oil for PUFA. Chronic overfeeding adaptations can also vary according to training status. Garthe et al. Elite athletes in a variety of sports were used. Lean mass gains were slightly but not significantly higher in the nutritionally counseled group 1.

In contrast, Rozenek et al. A non-supplemented control group was included in the comparison, and this group underwent the same progressive resistance training protocol as the treatment groups.

In contrast to Garthe et al. The CHO group showed slightly better results than CHO-PRO, although not to a statistically significant degree 3. It was speculated that both groups consumed adequate protein at baseline 1. However, Garthe et al. It can be argued that sustaining a caloric surplus is not necessary for muscle anabolism since LM gains have been reported in the literature during hypocaloric conditions [ 26 , 80 , , ].

Therefore, it is likely that diets seeking to optimize rates of LM gain are compromised by sustained caloric deficits, and optimized by sustained caloric surpluses to facilitate anabolic processes and support increasing training demands.

Understanding how various diet types affect body composition is of utmost importance to researchers and practitioners.

Ultimately, the interpretation of the data and implementation of the procedures determine the progress made by clients, patients, and the public. Fortunately, the current body of research is rich with information that can guide evidence-based theory and practice. Body composition assessment methods vary in their level of precision, reliability, and availability.

Each method has its strengths and weaknesses. No single approach is ideal for all circumstances. Rather, the practitioner or researcher must employ the most practical option for the assessment needs of the individuals at hand, in order to achieve consistency in the face of inherent limitations and logistical considerations such as financial expense and technician skill.

The various diet archetypes are wide-ranging in total energy and macronutrient distribution. Each type carries varying degrees of supporting data, and varying degrees of unfounded claims.

Common threads run through the diets in terms of mechanism of action for weight loss and weight gain i. There is a vast multitude of diets. In addition, there are numerous subtypes that fall under the major diet archetypes.

Practitioners, clinicians, and researchers need to maintain a grasp of the claims versus the evidence underlying each archetype to properly guide science-based practical and educational objectives with clients, patients, and the public.

All body composition assessment methods have strengths and limitations. Thus, the selection of the method should weigh practicality and consistency with the prohibitive potential of cost, invasiveness, availability, reproducibility, and technician skill requirements.

Ultimately, the needs of the client, patient, or research question should be matched with the chosen method; individualization and environmental considerations are essential.

Diets focused primarily on FM loss and weight loss beyond initial reductions in body water operate under the fundamental mechanism of a sustained caloric deficit. The higher the baseline FM level, the more aggressively the caloric deficit may be imposed [ 27 ].

As subjects get leaner, slower rates of weight loss can better preserve LM, as in Garthe et al. Helms et al. Although LM gains have been reported in the literature during hypocaloric conditions, diets primarily focused on LM gain are likely optimized via sustained caloric surplus to facilitate anabolic processes and support increasing training demands.

The composition and magnitude of the surplus, the inclusion of an exercise program, as well as training status of the subjects can influence the nature of the gains. Larger caloric surpluses are more appropriate for untrained subjects who are primed for more dramatic progress in LM gain [ ] and for those with a high level of NEAT [ ].

On the other hand, smaller caloric surpluses are appropriate for more advanced trainees who may be at a higher risk for undue FM gain during aggressive hypercaloric conditions [ ].

It should be noted that not all trainees will fit within this general framework. Some novices might require smaller surpluses while some advanced trainees will require larger surpluses in order to push muscular gains forward.

It is the job of the practitioner to tailor programs to the inevitable variability of individual response.

To date, no controlled, inpatient isocaloric diet comparison where protein is matched between groups has reported a clinically meaningful fat loss or thermic advantage to the lower-carbohydrate or ketogenic diet [ 60 ].

The collective evidence in this vein invalidates the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis of obesity. However, ketogenic diets have shown appetite-suppressing potential exemplified by spontaneous caloric intake reductions in subjects on ketogenic diets without purposeful caloric restriction.

Athletic performance is a separate goal with varying demands on carbohydrate availability depending on the nature of the sport. Carbohydrate restriction can have an ergolytic potential, particularly for endurance sports.

Effects of carbohydrate restriction on strength and power warrant further research. Increasing dietary protein to levels significantly beyond current recommendations for athletic populations may improve body composition. Time-restricted feeding a variant of IF combined with resistance training is an emerging area of research that has thus far shown mixed results [ , ].

However, the body of intermittent caloric restriction research, on the whole, has indicated no significant advantage over daily caloric restriction for improving body composition [ ]. Therefore, programming of linear versus nonlinear caloric deficits should be determined by individual preference, tolerance, and athletic goals.

Adequate protein, resistance training, and an appropriate rate of weight loss should be the primary focus for achieving the objective of LM retention or gain during FM loss.

The long-term success of the diet depends upon how effectively the mitigating factors of homeostatic drive are suppressed or circumvented. However, the majority of the existing research showing AT has involved diets that combine aggressive caloric restriction with low protein intakes and an absence of resistance training; therefore, essentially creating a perfect storm for the slowing of metabolism.

Research that has mindfully included resistance training and adequate protein has circumvented the problem of AT [ 25 ] and LM loss [ 26 ], despite very low-calorie intakes. When ranking nutritional factors by importance or impact on body composition, a cake analogy is simple, vivid, and memorable.

The cake is total daily macronutrition and micronutrition , the icing is the specific timing and distribution of nutrient intake through the day, and the sprinkles are supplements that might help trainees clinch the competitive edge.

An ideal yet not always feasible scenario is a multidisciplinary team approach to client or patient care i. This makes the most efficient use of expertise in covering the various facets of lifestyle modification, and when necessary, medical intervention [ ].

Research on dietary effects on body composition has plenty of gray areas and unbeaten paths ripe for investigation. There is still a general lack of research on women and older populations.

Studies on the effect of different within-day meal frequencies and nutrient distributions in varying energetic balances combined with resistance or endurance training are still rather scarce.

Linear versus nonlinear macronutrient intakes through the week, combined with exercise, is still an untapped area in research despite being widely practiced in the real-world. Therefore, while a certain amount of our current knowledge will remain static, scientists both in the lab and in the field should stay vigilant and open-minded to the modification and falsification of models and beliefs as the march of research continues.

Fat-free mass, used interchangeably with lean mass LM according to how it was reported in the literature. Park B, Yoon J. Relative skeletal muscle mass is associated with development of metabolic syndrome.

Diabetes Metab J. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Ho-Pham L, Nguyen U, Nguyen T. Association between lean mass, fat mass, and bone mineral density: a meta-analysis.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Lee J, Hong Y, Shin H, Lee W. Associations of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity with metabolic syndrome considering both muscle mass and muscle strength.

J Prev Med Public Health. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Wolfe R. The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Wang Z, Pierson RJ, Heymsfield S. The five-level model: a new approach to organizing body-composition research. Lee S, Gallagher D.

Assessment methods in human body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. Toomey C, McCormack W, Jakeman P. The effect of hydration status on the measurement of lean tissue mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Appl Physiol. Bone J, Ross M, Tomcik K, Jeacocke N, Hopkins W, Burke L.

Manipulation of muscle creatine and glycogen changes DXA estimates of body composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Duren D, Sherwood R, Czerwinski S, Lee M, Choh A, Siervogel R, et al.

Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Wagner D, Heyward V. Techniques of body composition assessment: a review of laboratory and field methods. Res Q Exerc Sport.

Ackland T, Lohman TG, Sundgot-Borgen J, Maughan RJ, Meyer NL, Stewart AD, et al. Current status of body composition assessment in sport: Review and position statement on behalf of the Ad Hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.

medical commission. Sports Med. doi: S M, Lazović B, Delić M, Lazić J, Aćimović T, Brkić P. Body composition assessment in athletes: a systematic review.

Med Pregl. Article Google Scholar. Wells J, Fewtrell M. Measuring body composition. Arch Dis Child. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Schoenfeld B, Aragon A, Moon J, Krieger J, Tiryaki-Sonmez G. Comparison of amplitude-mode ultrasound versus air displacement plethysmography for assessing body composition changes following participation in a structured weight-loss programme in women.

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. Williams J, Wells J, Wilson C, Haroun D, Lucas A, Fewtrell M. Evaluation of Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in healthy persons and patients by comparison with the criterion 4-component model.

Smith-Ryan A, Blue M, Trexler E, Hirsch K. Utility of ultrasound for body fat assessment: validity and reliability compared to a multicompartment criterion.

Wagner D. Ultrasound as a tool to assess body fat. J Obes. Buchholz A, Bartok C, Schoeller D. The validity of bioelectrical impedance models in clinical populations.

Nutr Clin Pract. Bosy-Westphal A, Schautz B, Later W, Kehayias J, Gallagher D, Müller M. What makes a BIA equation unique? Validity of eight-electrode multifrequency BIA to estimate body composition in a healthy adult population. Eur J Clin Nutr. Toomey CC A, Hughes K, Norton C, Jakeman P.

A review of body composition measurement in the assessment of health. Top Clin Nutr. Formula food-reducing diets:a new evidence-based addition to the weight management tool box.

Nutr Bull. Tsai A, Wadden T. The evolution of very-low-calorie diets: an update and meta-analysis. Obesity Silver Spring.

Chang J, Kashyap S. The protein-sparing modified fast for obese patients with type 2 diabetes: what to expect. Cleve Clin J Med. Saris W. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss.

Obes Res. Bryner R, Ullrich I, Sauers J, Donley D, Hornsby G, Kolar M, et al. Effects of resistance vs. aerobic training combined with an calorie liquid diet on lean body mass and resting metabolic rate. J Am Coll Nutr. Donnelly J, Sharp T, Houmard J, Carlson M, Hill J, Whatley J, et al.

Muscle hypertrophy with large-scale weight loss and resistance training. Nackers L, Ross K, Perri M. The association between rate of initial weight loss and long-term success in obesity treatment: does slow and steady win the race?

Int J Behav Med. Diet and body composition. Effect of very low calorie diets and exercise. Makris A, Foster G. Dietary approaches to the treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. Manore M. Exercise and the institute of medicine recommendations for nutrition.

Curr Sports Med Rep. La Berge A. How the ideology of low fat conquered America. J Hist Med Allied Sci. History of Dietary Guidance Development in the United States and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. USDA, USDHHS. Government Printing Office; Hooper LAA, Bunn D, Brown T, Summerbell CD, Skeaff CM.

Effects of total fat intake on body weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Google Scholar. Lissner L, Levitsky D, Strupp B, Kalkwarf H, Roe D. Dietary fat and the regulation of energy intake in human subjects. Kendall A, Levitsky D, Strupp B, Lissner L. Weight loss on a low-fat diet: consequence of the imprecision of the control of food intake in humans.

Karl J, Roberts S. Energy density, energy intake, and body weight regulation in adults. Adv Nutr. Saquib N, Natarajan L, Rock C, Flatt S, Madlensky L, Kealey S, et al.

The impact of a long-term reduction in dietary energy density on body weight within a randomized diet trial. Nutr Cancer. Stubbs R, Whybrow S. Energy density, diet composition and palatability: influences on overall food energy intake in humans.

Physiol Behav. Huang R, Huang C, Hu F, Chavarro J. Vegetarian diets and weight reduction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Gen Intern Med. Gardner C, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, Kim S, Stafford R, Balise R, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial.

de Souza R, Bray G, Carey V, Hall K, LeBoff M, Loria C, et al.

Compozition you for visiting nature. Subcutaneous fat thickness are Nutrigion a browser version Nutrition for body composition limited Nutrition for body composition for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more Cor to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer. In Nutritioj meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Excess body weight is associated with an imbalance between energy expenditure and dietary intake but evidence on the association between diet quality and body composition remains equivocal. Percent body fat BF was assessed via dual X-ray absorptiometry and PA was determined via a multi-sensor device, worn over a period of 10 days. PA was a stronger contributor to the variability in BF than the HEI and the association between HEI and BF was significant only in men. Different types fof diets Nuttition specific foods can High-intensity circuit training significant effects on body composition. Understanding Nutrition for body composition effects cmposition essential Nutrition for body composition individuals looking to optimize their body composition composiiton. High-protein diets are commonly associated with promoting muscle growth and repair. Proteins provide the essential amino acids required for protein synthesis, supporting muscle development as well as a host of other functions. Protein is a fundamental building block for cells, tissues, and organs, including muscles, bones, skin, and hair. It plays a crucial role in the growth, repair, and maintenance of these structures. Nutrition for body composition

Author: Mitilar

1 thoughts on “Nutrition for body composition

Leave a comment

Yours email will be published. Important fields a marked *

Design by ThemesDNA.com